Why do poor people get poorer?

 There is a new field called the neuroscience of poverty which is finding correlations between poverty and the conditions of living in poverty and brain development and functioning. The Newsweek article, Growing up poor is so stressful, it can affect brain development, goes into some detail about the latest finding.

“Though it’s still largely based on correlations between brain patterns and particular environments, the research points to a disturbing conclusion: Poverty and the conditions that often accompany it—violence, excessive noise, chaos at home, pollution, malnutrition, abuse and parents without jobs—can affect the interactions, formation and pruning of connections in the young brain.”

There “is a direct connection between the body’s stress-response system and brain development. And being poor is inherently stressful.”

The article sums up the findings of medical journal research articles and brings the information to life.

It is both fascinating and devastating information. The real question will be how can we use the information moving forward to create more opportunity for those who have to grow up in environments which negatively impact their ability to learn and improve their lives.

Global freelance market

About 6 years ago, I used Elance. I actually had a full time job. I need a simple C++ utility to download a file once a month from a password protected ftp Internet site and parse it. Simple, but as a data architect outside my coding knowledge. I wrote detailed and precise specs and put the job to bid on Elance. Within a day I had hired a programmer in India who was moonlighting on Elance. He asked the right technical questions about the Specifications. I hired him and within 24 hours he provided the source code. When I could not get it to run, with great hesitation I let him logon to my computer remotely and identify the setup difference that was causing a problem. I paid him, and I setup the application to run. It was ideal. 

Fast forward a few years and Elance is merged with their competitor owork to create a hybrid firm, Upwork. 

This time I needed a legal document translated from Spanish to English I wrote the specs, and searched by qualifications and ask a person in Venezuela to bid on the job. She lists herself as a lawyer. Of course, it does occur to me that she may not be who she says she is. But it’s a small job, and the results will tell me if I can use her again. 

In my experience, the more specific your requirements documentation is, the more likely you are to get what you want. 

I will be interested to see her work and find out if I wasted money or saved money. If my specs were specific enough. 

I can see that Upwork is similar to Elance but makes it more difficult to search for particular qualifications and to view completed jobs. 

But it is still brilliant for small jobs, bringing savings to expensive areas and sending cash to areas with faltering economies and particularly to areas with social unrest keeping people from working. 

For my purposes it does not displace any local workers because my jobs are too small to hire people, but specific enough that finding a niche firm would result in an expensive project, too expensive for me to do. So I would live without getting the work done or spend huge amounts of my free time learning new languages whether programming or linguistic. 

There were certainly times in my life when making a few extra dollars freelancing online would have been helpful to my cash flow situation. 

A more in depth look might turn up some abuses. Unfinished work, or agencies hiring people for a pittance and charging US prices for them. This was a classic Kanbay/Capgemini strategy in the ‘oughts. They brought in “freshers”, paid them $3 per hour and billed the client corporations an offshore rate of $30 per hour. Since they pushed off the training onto anyone they could on the client side, they made a tidy profit. 

But in an open marketplace such as Upwork, that should not happen. The lower prices generate more work. Work which may have lain fallow if costs were to high. Everyone gains efficiencies. 

Is this Islamic terrorism?

This week a man killed 50 people in a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. He was a Muslim man. Near the end of his life he called 911 and pledged allegiance to ISIL. That’s all we know today.

There are so many parts to this news. The horror. Grief. Victims. Survivors. LGBT persecution. Terrorism.

But too quickly, politics is also involved. The knee jerk reaction on the left is control guns. The knee jerk reaction on the right is attack Muslims.

What if there was a more thought out response? What would it be.

But there is a nagging voice in the back of my mind that asks is this really Islamic terrorism? What if this guy had no contact with any Islamic militants or their theories? What if he spent years fighting with his father about being gay, and his father rejected him. What if he hated himself for being gay? What if he attacked gay people because he hates himself? And he had a triggering event in his life? What if he didn’t know any ISIL members at all, and the only person he had to tell about ISIL was a stranger on the 911 line? Then is he an Islamic terrorist or a mass shooter?

Update 6/14/16

There is a tiny drum beat coming through… This mass shooter frequented gay nightclubs, used gay apps to connect with other men. I doubt anyone will come forward as one of his partners because of the stigma associated with this man. But their is an implication from his first wife that he was tormented by the fact that his father would never accept him as a gay man. He married twice and abused both wives. He was an angry man. He fought with his father. If he was gay and his father rejected him for this reason with many violent fights, then he may have felt his orientation was against his family and his religion. He may have hated himself, struck out in hate. Hate of himself mixed up with hate for others.

He told people in the club that he had accomplices, a bomb vest, snipers outside. But he had no one. He tended toward grandiosity. But he felt shame and worthlessness. He sought to be a famous terrorist to make sense of his life. But he was only a conflicted gay man from an intolerant family who could not love him for himself. He turned his anger on others and thought somewhere in the world he will be celebrated if he can just find someone to get out his message that he is not a mass murderer committing a hate crime but a jihadi in service to Islam.

Well, here is one blog that doesn’t recall your name, and sees you were a lonely gay man who hated himself and committed a hate crime in a double effort to achieve fame and destroy what he couldn’t accept. Your wife may go to prison. Your child sent to foster care. Your father will try to misdirect people because he would rather be the father of a terrorist than bear the shame of being the father of a gay man.

And this is from a culture where using boys as substitutes for female prostitutes is accepted in some circles.

All these speculations with the caveat that we know nothing of this man or his life.

Advertisers Need to Police Themselves

Technical Problems?

I was having difficulty reading an article on Forbes today. The browser kept hanging and reloading, scrolling by itself up and down the page like a million little trolls were messing with my screen. So I installed AdBlocker Pro. I was able to read 3 articles, looked up and saw that in 2 minutes, 88 ads had been blocked. Wow. That is a lot of ads for not very much screen real-estate. But the real problem is that those ads were all junk programming. They loaded slowly, crashed themselves, reloaded, crashed the page, reloaded the page. Every attempt to scroll down was met with an agitated ad trying to prevent the scrolling.

The quality level of the programming of advertising is abhorrent. It literally threatens the entire industry. I generally prefer not to block advertising because I realize that many of the free websites that I enjoy make their revenue from advertising. But the complete lack of standards of quality for programming advertising is ruining the experience for everyone. If everyone has to use an ad blocker, then there will be no point in purchasing digital  advertising. The industry cannot afford to wait for a government agency to step in and try to set some standards. By then it will be so late that businesses will be trying to put ad blockers out of business by giving money to elected government officials, e.g.: lobbying.

You cannot lobby yourselves out of this problem. As a reader, I have many options. If the browser will not work, I can purchase digital versions of magazines which show ads much as print does, still and quality controlled on the page. I can subscribe to services which sell digital subscriptions. I can go reading print offline.

If I couldn’t block the 88 ad assault on me reading Forbes online, then I would absolutely go back to print. Print is a better user experience, easier to read, easier to lend to others, looks better and does not try to hijack my computer.

Not technical problems!

After I installed ad blocking to my browser, I tried to visit Forbes.com in a new tab. Forbes would not allow me to view it’s content. It required me to sign up which I did not do. Instead I temporarily turned off the ad blocker. As soon as I turned off the ad blocker, Forbes displayed a notice thanking me for turning off the ad blocker. Then it displayed a message that I would be allowed to view Forbes.com with ‘limited ads’ for 30 days. I guess that was some kind of reward.

The result is that Forbes displays a normal number of ads and loads at a normal speed without taking over my browser and crashing it’s page over and over again. Which means that Forbes is aware of how bad their user experience is. But they will only improve the user experience on their website for users who ‘complain’ with the digital form of complain being to install an ad blocker.

It is not just easy for websites to make their pages available with controlled use of ads, but it is easy for them to do. This is then not a technical problem but an issue of indifference to the people who support them by viewing their site and the ads on the site.

This is why businesses get a bad reputation. Because they earn it.

 

Metadata unknowns


What I learned today is that when it comes to photos we have a lot of options for viewing and erasing metadata, but when it comes to video you are on your own more or less. For instance, GoPro does not include gps data. But iPhones and iPads do include geotagging. 

There are a couple kinds of geotagging. There is the geotag for the file, a single location. And there is filmstream geotagging. The latter indicates the location as the film plays. You could think of it as a location video you could play alongside the visual content. If you are filming the alps from a train, you’re moving with each frame of video. 

Video does not have as clearly defined metadata as the EXIF data agreed upon for photographs. But you can still remove the geolocation data from mov files taken with iPhone / iPad cameras. Either by moving the video to your Mac and using EXIFTool, or bu using an app that will modify the metadata for video as well as photos. 

I am using the iOS app Metadata Pro and it works perfectly to remove location data from both photos and videos. 

Dark Turn

The thing about a new blog is that you are learning what it will be about as you go. Even if you have a plan and intentions, sometimes you are drawn a certain way. And I am noticing that the articles I am recommending are taking a dark turn. A very dark turn. So while I was going to go with a story about human trafficking, I think I will go light. In fact, that article on Snowden on Vice news talking about how cell phones are being used to spy on us, yes, each of us, no, that one will have to wait. The only logical choice is kittens. 

The Sex-Abused Children Lining the Cartels’ Pockets – The Daily Beast

I don’t know if I can bear to talk about this story. But it must be heard or nothing will change.

The United States should track child rapists who travel abroad to commit crimes and hold them accountable in the U.S. It is wrong to let them export pedophilia because they can afford to do so. Canada should do so also. Those are the countries mentioned in this article.

The Acapulco of my youth where my parents traveled, and I once dreamed of visiting no longer exists. It has become the fourth most dangerous city in the world.

When Eva Longoria gets married in Acapulco, she clearly has had people who arranged security with the cartels. She wouldn’t risk her life or the life of her friends and family. She is helping to support the system that makes life miserable for the poor and unbearable for impoverished children. It seems wrong that she holds an elaborate, expensive wedding in a place that is so unsafe for it’s own citizens. And the only coverage of the event is gossipy and positive. What do you think? Is she helping rehabilitate Acapulco or feeding the beast?

via The Sex-Abused Children Lining the Cartels’ Pockets – The Daily Beast

via Eva Longoria married in Acapulco

Mr. Trump’s All-White Nostalgia Movement – The Daily Beast

So this is another perspective on the question everyone is wondering: why Trump? Election 2016 has created it’s own pastime, trying to figure out why anyone would vote for Donald Trump for anything at all let alone to run for the position of leader of the free world.

The author seems to have found a young person who feels that political correctness has or could cost him his job. He believes that the country is being taken over by anti-white, anti-conservative goons who will fire at will anyone who doesn’t agree with them. It doesn’t help the poor fellow lives and works in San Francisco. It doesn’t even help that he considers himself a feminist and is married to a second generation immigrant from Asia.

The premise is that Trump’s followers are all white males of any age and all economic ranges who believe they are being run out of Dodge. In other words, the emphasis on multiculturalism, the few achievements of affirmative action, the changing demographic makeup of parts of the country are making these white men feel afraid. And the expression of these feelings is anger and perhaps shopping for guns. Or voting for Trump.

Hence the idea that American needs to be made great again. Which is really saying that American needs to be made white again. Which isn’t going to happen. Not even if you round up 12 million white people of latino heritage, put them in camps and ship them to foreign countries.

 

via Mr. Trump’s All-White Nostalgia Movement – The Daily Beast